Dropbox: Difference between revisions

From Research Computing Center Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 29: Line 29:


*'''Pros'''
*'''Pros'''
#Item 1
#Free
#Supports FTP, FTPS and SFTP
#Supports resume and transfer of files > 4GB.
#Client supports Linux, Mac OSX and Windows


*'''Cons'''
*'''Cons'''
#Item1
#Server requires Windows XP, Vista or 7.


== RhinoSoft Serv-U ==
== RhinoSoft Serv-U ==

Revision as of 10:33, 31 July 2013

Project Status

Jason will do presentation on the 30th, at our meeting.

Questions and Concerns

  • What is the maximum file size supported for transfer?
  • Is there an issue when large numbers of files must be kept up with?
  • Do we want a Dropbox style service or an FTP style service?
  • How well does the solution handle file permissions, especially group permissions?

Software

SparkleShare

http://sparkleshare.org/

  • Pros
  1. Open Source
  2. Availibility for Mac, Windows, and Linux
  3. Version control (Git based)
  4. Notifications of changes to folder contents
  • Cons
  1. Sharing folders not built into desktop client
  2. Git isn’t built for handling large, binary files
  3. Version control not built into desktop client

FileZilla

https://filezilla-project.org/

  • Pros
  1. Free
  2. Supports FTP, FTPS and SFTP
  3. Supports resume and transfer of files > 4GB.
  4. Client supports Linux, Mac OSX and Windows
  • Cons
  1. Server requires Windows XP, Vista or 7.

RhinoSoft Serv-U

http://www.serv-u.com/

  • Pros
  1. Item 1
  • Cons
  1. Item1

F*EX Frams' Fast File Exchange

http://fex.rus.uni-stuttgart.de/

  • Pros
  1. Item 1
  • Cons
  1. Item1

OwnCloud

http://owncloud.org/

  • Pros
  1. Present in EPEL repository
  • Cons
  1. Item1

SeaFile

http://seafile.com/en/home/

  • Pros
  1. Item 1
  • Cons
  1. Item1

dotCloud

https://www.dotcloud.com/

  • Pros
  1. Item 1
  • Cons
  1. Item1

Globus Online

https://www.globusonline.org/

  • Pros
  1. Item 1
  • Cons
  1. Item1

Links