Dropbox: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==SparkleShare== | ==SparkleShare== | ||
http://sparkleshare.org/ | http://sparkleshare.org/ | ||
===Features=== | |||
===Pros and Cons=== | |||
*'''Pros''' | *'''Pros''' | ||
Line 27: | Line 32: | ||
== FileZilla== | == FileZilla== | ||
https://filezilla-project.org/ | https://filezilla-project.org/ | ||
===Features=== | |||
===Pros and Cons=== | |||
*'''Pros''' | *'''Pros''' | ||
Line 39: | Line 49: | ||
== RhinoSoft Serv-U == | == RhinoSoft Serv-U == | ||
http://www.serv-u.com/ | http://www.serv-u.com/ | ||
===Features=== | |||
===Pros and Cons=== | |||
*'''Pros''' | *'''Pros''' | ||
Line 53: | Line 68: | ||
== F*EX Frams' Fast File Exchange == | == F*EX Frams' Fast File Exchange == | ||
http://fex.rus.uni-stuttgart.de/ | http://fex.rus.uni-stuttgart.de/ | ||
===Features=== | |||
===Pros and Cons=== | |||
*'''Pros''' | *'''Pros''' | ||
Line 62: | Line 82: | ||
== OwnCloud == | == OwnCloud == | ||
http://owncloud.org/ | http://owncloud.org/ | ||
===Features=== | |||
===Pros and Cons=== | |||
*'''Pros''' | *'''Pros''' | ||
Line 80: | Line 105: | ||
== dotCloud == | == dotCloud == | ||
https://www.dotcloud.com/ | https://www.dotcloud.com/ | ||
===Features=== | |||
===Pros and Cons=== | |||
*'''Pros''' | *'''Pros''' | ||
Line 89: | Line 119: | ||
==Globus Online== | ==Globus Online== | ||
https://www.globusonline.org/ | https://www.globusonline.org/ | ||
===Features=== | |||
===Pros and Cons=== | |||
*'''Pros''' | *'''Pros''' |
Revision as of 09:48, 31 July 2013
Project Status
Jason will do presentation at the August 6th weekly meeting.
Questions and Concerns
- What is the maximum file size supported for transfer?
- Is there an issue when large numbers of files must be kept up with?
- Do we want a Dropbox style service or an FTP style service?
- How well does the solution handle file permissions, especially group permissions?
Software
Features
Pros and Cons
- Pros
- Open Source
- Availibility for Mac, Windows, and Linux
- Version control (Git based)
- Notifications of changes to folder contents
- Cons
- Sharing folders not built into desktop client
- Git isn’t built for handling large, binary files
- Version control not built into desktop client
FileZilla
https://filezilla-project.org/
Features
Pros and Cons
- Pros
- Free
- Supports FTP, FTPS and SFTP
- Supports resume and transfer of files > 4GB.
- Client supports Linux, Mac OSX and Windows
- Cons
- Server requires Windows XP, Vista or 7.
RhinoSoft Serv-U
Features
Pros and Cons
- Pros
- Web based admin
- Supports FTP, SFTP and FTPS
- Supports web and mobile transfers
- Guaranteed fidelity to RFCs
- Supports both IPv4 and IPv6
- Supports large files (>2GB) on all interfaces
- Cons
- Liscensed ($500 for 250, $3000 unlimited for 1 year)
F*EX Frams' Fast File Exchange
http://fex.rus.uni-stuttgart.de/
Features
Pros and Cons
- Pros
- Item 1
- Cons
- Item1
OwnCloud
Features
Pros and Cons
- Pros
- Present in EPEL repository
- Cons
- Item1
SeaFile
- Pros
- Item 1
- Cons
- Item1
dotCloud
Features
Pros and Cons
- Pros
- Item 1
- Cons
- Item1
Globus Online
Features
Pros and Cons
- Pros
- Item 1
- Cons
- Item1